DevTools VS

Bulma vs Tailwind CSS

Updated Jun 28, 2026

Quick Verdict

Tailwind CSS has 1.9x more GitHub stars, while Tailwind CSS has 335.1x more weekly downloads.

GitHub Stars
Bulma 50.1K
vs
Tailwind CSS 95.8K
Downloads/wk
Bulma 355.4K
vs
Tailwind CSS 119.1M
Contributors
Bulma 431
vs
Tailwind CSS 364
Bundle Size
Bulma N/A
vs
Tailwind CSS 69.3 KB

Bulma

Website

Modern CSS framework based on Flexbox

cssflexboxresponsivemodular

Tailwind CSS

Website

A utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development

cssutility-firstresponsivecustomizable

Detailed Comparison

Side-by-side metrics from GitHub and npm

Metric
Bulma
Tailwind CSS
GitHub Stars
50.1K
95.8K
Weekly Downloads
355.4K
119.1M
Forks
3.9K
5.3K
Open Issues
523
65
Contributors
431
364
Bundle Size (gzip)
N/A
69.3 KB
Dependencies
0
0
Latest Version
1.0.4
4.3.1
Last Commit
Mar 1, 2026
Jun 26, 2026
License
MIT
MIT
First Published
Jan 27, 2016
Oct 6, 2017

Download Trends

Weekly npm downloads over the past 52 weeks

Feature Comparison

Framework capabilities at a glance

Feature
Bulma
Tailwind CSS
Utility Classes
Components
Theming
Responsive
Dark Mode
Tree Shaking
Typescript

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Bulma vs Tailwind CSS

Is Bulma better than Tailwind CSS?

It depends on your use case. Bulma is modern css framework based on flexbox, while Tailwind CSS is a utility-first css framework for rapid ui development. Compare the stats and features above to decide which fits your needs.

Is Bulma still maintained in 2026?

Yes, Bulma was last updated on March 1, 2026 and has 431 contributors.

Can I migrate from Bulma to Tailwind CSS?

Migration complexity depends on how deeply Bulma is integrated into your project. Both tools serve similar purposes in the CSS Frameworks space, so migration is generally feasible with proper planning.

Related Comparisons

Explore more comparisons