DevTools VS

MobX vs Signals (TC39)

Updated Mar 4, 2026

Quick Verdict

MobX has 6.4x more GitHub stars.

GitHub Stars
MobX 28.2K
vs
Signals (TC39) 4.4K
Downloads/wk
MobX 0
vs
Signals (TC39) 0
Contributors
MobX 371
vs
Signals (TC39) 49
Bundle Size
MobX N/A
vs
Signals (TC39) N/A

Simple, scalable state management through transparent reactive programming

statereactiveobservablemutable

Signals (TC39)

Website

Reactive primitives for managing application state

statereactivesignalsfine-grained

Detailed Comparison

Side-by-side metrics from GitHub and npm

Metric
MobX
Signals (TC39)
GitHub Stars
28.2K
4.4K
Weekly Downloads
0
0
Forks
1.8K
121
Open Issues
85
43
Contributors
371
49
Bundle Size (gzip)
N/A
N/A
Dependencies
0
1
Latest Version
6.15.0
2.8.1
Last Commit
Feb 27, 2026
Mar 4, 2026
License
MIT
MIT
First Published
Feb 19, 2016
Aug 24, 2022

Feature Comparison

Framework capabilities at a glance

Feature
MobX
Signals (TC39)
Typescript
Devtools
Middleware
Selectors
Async
Atomic
Framework Agnostic

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about MobX vs Signals (TC39)

Is MobX better than Signals (TC39)?

It depends on your use case. MobX is simple, scalable state management through transparent reactive programming, while Signals (TC39) is reactive primitives for managing application state. Compare the stats and features above to decide which fits your needs.

Is MobX still maintained in 2026?

Yes, MobX was last updated on February 27, 2026 and has 371 contributors.

Can I migrate from MobX to Signals (TC39)?

Migration complexity depends on how deeply MobX is integrated into your project. Both tools serve similar purposes in the State Management space, so migration is generally feasible with proper planning.

Related Comparisons

Explore more comparisons