DevTools VS

Mocha vs Playwright

Updated Oct 18, 2026

Quick Verdict

Playwright has 4.3x more GitHub stars.

GitHub Stars
Mocha 22.9K
vs
Playwright 98.0K
Downloads/wk
Mocha 0
vs
Playwright 56.0M
Contributors
Mocha 622
vs
Playwright 822
Bundle Size
Mocha 32.0 KB
vs
Playwright 957.2 KB

Mocha

Website

Simple, flexible, fun JavaScript test framework for Node.js and the browser

testingflexiblebddtdd

Playwright

Website

Reliable end-to-end testing for modern web apps

testinge2ebrowserautomation

Detailed Comparison

Side-by-side metrics from GitHub and npm

Metric
Mocha
Playwright
GitHub Stars
22.9K
98.0K
Weekly Downloads
0
56.0M
Forks
3.2K
6.6K
Open Issues
225
200
Contributors
622
822
Bundle Size (gzip)
32.0 KB
957.2 KB
Dependencies
16
1
Latest Version
12.0.3
1.64.1
Last Commit
Oct 18, 2026
Oct 17, 2026
License
MIT
Apache-2.0
First Published
Nov 8, 2011
Jan 23, 2015

Feature Comparison

Framework capabilities at a glance

Feature
Mocha
Playwright
Typescript
Browser Testing
Unit Testing
E2e
Snapshot
Mocking
Parallel

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Mocha vs Playwright

Is Mocha better than Playwright?

It depends on your use case. Mocha is simple, flexible, fun javascript test framework for node.js and the browser, while Playwright is reliable end-to-end testing for modern web apps. Compare the stats and features above to decide which fits your needs.

Is Mocha still maintained in 2026?

Yes, Mocha was last updated on October 18, 2026 and has 622 contributors.

Can I migrate from Mocha to Playwright?

Migration complexity depends on how deeply Mocha is integrated into your project. Both tools serve similar purposes in the Testing Frameworks space, so migration is generally feasible with proper planning.

Related Comparisons

Explore more comparisons