Bulma vs shadcn/ui
Updated Oct 18, 2026
Quick Verdict
shadcn/ui has 2.5x more GitHub stars.
GitHub Stars
Bulma 50.0K
vs
shadcn/ui 125.8K
Downloads/wk
Bulma 150.8K
vs
shadcn/ui N/A
Contributors
Bulma 430
vs
shadcn/ui 647
Bundle Size
Bulma 77.8 KB
vs
shadcn/ui N/A
Detailed Comparison
Side-by-side metrics from GitHub and npm
Metric
Bulma
shadcn/ui
GitHub Stars
50.0K
125.8K
Weekly Downloads
150.8K
N/A
Forks
3.9K
13.5K
Open Issues
526
1.8K
Contributors
430
647
Bundle Size (gzip)
77.8 KB
N/A
Dependencies
0
N/A
Latest Version
1.0.4
N/A
Last Commit
Sep 21, 2026
Oct 18, 2026
License
MIT
MIT
First Published
Jan 27, 2016
Jan 4, 2023
Feature Comparison
Framework capabilities at a glance
Feature
Bulma
shadcn/ui
Utility Classes
Components
Theming
Responsive
Dark Mode
Tree Shaking
Typescript
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Bulma vs shadcn/ui
Is Bulma better than shadcn/ui?
It depends on your use case. Bulma is modern css framework based on flexbox, while shadcn/ui is beautifully designed, copy-paste react components built on radix and tailwind. Compare the stats and features above to decide which fits your needs.
Is Bulma still maintained in 2026?
Yes, Bulma was last updated on September 21, 2026 and has 430 contributors.
Can I migrate from Bulma to shadcn/ui?
Migration complexity depends on how deeply Bulma is integrated into your project. Both tools serve similar purposes in the CSS Frameworks space, so migration is generally feasible with proper planning.
Related Comparisons
Explore more comparisons